Friday, June 02, 2006

DaVinci versus Jesus???

Okay, so I didn’t plan to post today. I thought to leave you with my ugly photos all weekend. But I went to the doctor a few hours ago (those annoying annual checkups that we women endure at the hands of the all knowing medical field/scientific community), and when I left this van was in the parking lot.




Now, I don’t normally take pictures of cars in parking lots, but this van was so hard for me to believe that I was afraid if I didn’t snap a quick shot, no one else would believe it either.

And speaking of belief…

Okay, so I’m not what anyone would consider religious, although at other times in my life I tried on a few different ones for size. None really fit. But what exactly is going on behind those doors every Sunday? I mean, this person went out and spent money to have this sign made for and applied to his/her car. Is there some belief war that I didn’t know about? Is it Jesus versus Dan Brown? Or worse, Jesus versus DaVinci? Is our taste in fiction now really sending us to hell?

What is going on?

I mean, okay, I read (and to some degree, enjoyed) The DaVinci Code.

****SPOILER ALERT*** (if you don’t know and don’t want to know, skip this paragraph). So, my understanding and memory (it has been a while and I haven’t seen the movie) of the story is that Jesus and Mary Magdalene married and had children, that she was part of the divinity, and that the Church rooted out, covered up, and destroyed all knowledge of that piece of the religion: a sacred feminine, and love and sex as a base of the divine. She is the Holy Grail that has been lost.

Now, let’s just say, FOR A MOMENT, that this STORY is some argument that we are supposed to believe rather than just the work of FICTION that it I thought it was. What is Brown really saying here? It is true that Western culture has suppressed the feminine (divine or otherwise) for at least two thousand years. Many feminists trace the "flight from the feminine" back to Plato and his allegory of the cave (which might be thought of as a metaphor for the womb) where men had to abandon the cave to find Truth (See Luce Irigaray, Speculum of the Other Woman). Still others point out that Descartes' theory of mind over body connects women to the body and suggests that through reason and rationale thinking that body can be overcome (see Susan Bordo's Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesian Culture). In any case, Christianity has been a large part of that culture that has abandoned and oppressed women. So, perhaps there is a bit of wisdom in the Brown's story.

But it is a novel, not a sacred text. I mean, are there groups of people now building temples to Magdalene? Not that that is a horrible idea, but is this really something Christians should worry themselves over? So, why the sticker on this car?

What is so threatening to Christianity about a sacred feminine? The reaction leaves me contemplating the possibility that Dan Brown has actually struck some deep chord within us (or at least within some crazed Christians).

Is it a positive sign that the church is having to jump into defense? I mean, when I really think about what this sticker says, it seems to suggest that there is a choice in our beliefs, that the Bible may not actually have all the answers.

Am I wrong to see some strange illumination here?

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

i see the van has a georgia tag...but are u sure you didn't snap this picture in kimberly parked outside of one of our many shop a snack baptist churchs

4:36 PM  
Blogger Jebbo said...

"Galileo vs the Catholic Church...
Which do you believe?"

Not to pile on, but the whole infallibility thing gets on my nerves sometimes.

Saw the movie this weekend w/ my Mom, more fun if you have forgotten all the plotlines (as I had). And I listened to a really thoughtful discussion on this during my drive back to Houston.

I guess the best defense I took away was that many religious folks (especially Catholics) feel their values and beliefs are getting lost in a largely secular and materialistic culture. For them their faith is about taking care of the poor and sick while trying to be better people. But the media mirror shows them as pedophile priests, ignorant hillbillies, and ________.

Anyway, I get they feel under attack. I really do. But people who feel they are under attack rarely respond in a way that wins them any friends. And just like the liberals in America responded to Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly with Al Franken and Michael Moore, a lot of folks respond to perceived obnoxiousness with their own in-your-face attitude. Fish leads to darwin fish leads to fish eating darwin fish leads to... ugh.

Eh, that exhausts my diplomacy. Must recharge... need food...

Good to see you in L.A.

4:54 PM  
Blogger perrykat said...

Jebbo, so is the movie worth seeing?

10:44 PM  
Blogger Jebbo said...

Yeah, I'd say so. It's fun as somewhat thoughtful action picture, sorta Raiders of the Lost Ark meets an episode of Numbers (TV series about codebreaking etc).

I think the complaints are mainly that they don't have some big romance between Hanks and Tattou, that the whole thing is rather more analytic than passionate. Imagine that - a professor who doesn't have some passionate chemistry over 2 days with a police officer half his age.

Not great, but fun.

10:13 AM  
Blogger Seven Star Hand said...

Hello perrykat and ,

Most have totally missed the point that the Gnostic texts and others are making. Firstly, they refer to symbolic males and females, hence the philosophical masculine and feminine nature and character. All the Gnostic texts are philosophical and symbolic treatises, not literal narratives. When you try to interpret any of these ancient texts (including the Bible) as literal, you will always come to the wrong conclusions. Read verse twelve of the Gospel of Thomas to understand who I am...

You may not initially agree with everything I reveal, but be a little patient with my long-winded presentation of what I have waited a very long time to be able to say. I promise to amaze and enlighten.

Peace...

Here is the key to understanding what the Vatican and Papacy truly fear...

Pay close attention, profundity knocks at the door, listen for the key. Be Aware! Scoffing causes blindness...

Here's a real hot potato! Eat it up, digest it, and then feed it's bones to the hungry...

There's much more to the story of the Vatican's recent machinations than meets the eye. It's not the DaVinci Code or Gospel of Judas per se, but the fact that people have now been motivated to seek out the unequivocal truth about an age of deception, exactly when they expect me to appear. These recent controversies are spurring people to reevaluate the Vatican/Papacy and the religions that Rome spawned, at the worst possible time for them.

Remember, "I come as a thief..." ?

The DaVinci Code novel and movie are no more inaccurate as literal versions of history than the New Testament. The primary sub-plot involved purposeful symbology being used to encode hidden meanings, exactly like the Bible and related texts. In other words, none of these stories represent the literal truth. This is the common and pivotal fact of all such narratives about ancient Hebrew and Christian history. Debating whether the DaVinci Code, Gnostic texts, or the Bible are accurate history is a purposeful ploy designed to hide the truth by directing your inquiry away from the heart of the matter.

There is a foolproof way to verify the truth and expose centuries-old religious deceptions. It also proves why we can no longer let the Vatican tell us what to think about ancient history or much else. It is the common thread connecting why the ancient Hebrews, Yahad/Essene, Jews, Gnostics, Cathars, Templars, Dead Sea Scrolls, DaVinci Code, and others have been targets of Rome’s ire and evil machinations. The Vatican and its secret society cohorts don’t want you to understand that the ancient Hebrew symbology in all of these texts purposely encodes and exposes the truth about them. Furthermore, the structure of ancient wisdom symbology verifiably encodes the rules to decode messages built with it. This is what they most fear you will discover.

If the Bible represented the literal truth or even accurate history, there would be no need for faith in the assertions of deceptive and duplicitous clergy and their ilk. It is undeniable the New Testament is awash with ancient Hebrew symbolism and allegory. The same is evidenced in the Old Testament, Dead Sea Scrolls, Gnostic texts, biblical apocrypha, Quran, DaVinci Code, and other related sources. All ancient religious, mystical, and wisdom texts have been shrouded in mystery for millennia for one primary reason: The ability to understand their widely evidenced symbology was lost in antiquity. How do we finally solve these ages-old mysteries? To recast an often-used political adage: It’s [the] symbology, stupid!

It is beyond amazing that the Vatican still tries to insist the Gospels are the literal truth. Every miracle purported for Jesus has multiple direct symbolic parallels in the Old Testament, Apocalypse, Dead Sea Scrolls, and other symbolic narratives and traditions. Recasting the symbolism of earlier Hebrew texts as literal events in the New Testament is one of the central deceptions associated with Christianity. This is part of the secret knowledge held by the ancient Gnostics, Templars, Cathars, and others, which is presented with dramatic effect in the DaVinci Code. None of these narratives or stories were ever intended as the literal truth. This fact is the key to unraveling many ages-old mysteries and exposing the truth about the Vatican's long-term deceptions.

Moreover, the following Washington Post article (The Book of Bart) describes how many changes and embellishments were made to New Testament texts over the centuries, unequivocally demonstrating they are not original, infallible, or truthful. When you combine proof that the New Testament Gospels are not wholly literal with proof that these texts were heavily reworked in the early years of Christianity, you are left with only one possible conclusion. The Vatican has long lied to everyone about the central tenets and history of Christianity. This revelation also proves they are not the Creator’s representatives but Her long-time opponents. The recent hoopla over the Gospel of Judas and DaVinci Code demonstrates they are still desperately trying to deceive the world and obfuscate their true nature and activities.

It's no wonder the Vatican fears the truth more than anything else. As further proof of these assertions, seek to understand the symbolic significance of my name (Seven Star Hand) and you will have proof beyond disproof that Jews, Christians, and Muslims have long been duped by the great deceivers I warned humanity about over the millennia. What then is the purpose of "faith" but to keep good people from seeking to understand the truth?

Now comes justice, hot on its heels... (symbolism...)

Not only do I talk the talk, I walk the walk...
Here is Wisdom!!

Revelations from the Apocalypse

10:39 PM  
Blogger perrykat said...

Uh -- I think my blog was highjacked for a moment.

10:26 AM  
Blogger Jebbo said...

um yeah, i was kinda speechless. I'm considering doing a post with every controversial keyword in it, to see if I can get some drive-bys of my own. Stay tuned ;-)

3:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, well, some of us find no need to choose between the bible or the da vinci code. If I need someone to insult my intelligence and boss me around, I'll go to church! Your loving aunt, Charlotte

9:35 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home